Nike Hyperdunk X
Released 7/2018, High Top,
Add to Favourites
Performance Ratings
8.2
EXPERT RATING
4 reviews
9.8
USER RATING
3 ratings
Performance Summary
Solid performer at a fair price
Pros
Very supportive shoe
Fits like a glove
Cons
Traction doesn't hold up on dusty courts
Basic materials
Best Suitable For: Works best on clean courts
Category Performance Ratings
7.8
Traction
Wavy multidirectional traction pattern with durable rubber. Excellent grip on clean indoor courts but dust-sensitive and may need wiping.
8.5
Cushion
Dual Zoom Air units in heel and forefoot. Bouncy, springy ride with solid impact protection and quick response.
7.6
Materials
Textile upper with a small leather heel cup. Breathable and comfortable but not premium; durability is average.
8.3
Support
Stout heel counter, midfoot shank, lateral outrigger, and tight lacing. Provides strong lockdown and lateral stability.
8.8
Fit
Glove-like, secure fit with firm lockdown and no heel slip. Forefoot can be snug; wide feet should size up.
25%
Outdoor
Standard rubber outsole not built for outdoor abuse. Will work short term but wears quickly on concrete.
small
large
Sizing
Runs true to size for most players. Wide footers should consider a half size up.
narrow
wide
Width
Fits narrow-to-regular widths best. Forefoot can feel slightly narrow for wider feet.
Comparison to Similar Shoes:
![]() Nike Hyperdunk X | ![]() New Balance Fresh Foam BB V3 | ![]() Nike LeBron NXXT Genisus | ![]() Li-Ning Wade 808 5 Ultra | ![]() Air Jordan 40 | ![]() Nike Air Zoom G.T. Cut | Add shoe | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expert Rating | 8.2 | 8.8(0.6) | 8.2(0.0) | 8.9(0.7) | 8.8(0.6) | 8.8(0.6) | |
| User Rating | 9.8 | 10.0(0.2) | 9.4(0.4) | 9.5(0.3) | NA | 9.3(0.5) | |
| Best Price | $129.99 | $103.99 $130 | $135.99 $150 | $159 | $205 | $180 | |
| Type of Cut | High Top | High Top | High Top | Low Top | Low Top | Low Top | |
| Weight | NA | NA | NA | NA | 440g - 440g | 410g - 430g |
Expert Reviews of the Nike Hyperdunk X:
Expert Rating: 8.2 (ranks #275 of 381)
10 - Amazing
0
9 - Great
2
8 - Good
1
7 - Average
1
6 - Subpar
0
5 - Poor
0
8.7
September 26, 2018
If you need a dependable shoe for any indoor surface, with great cushioning, a semi-durable upper, and killer fit, look no further than the Nike Hyperdunk X
More details
8.6
September 26, 2018
For a fair list price of $130, this is a very solid performer.
More details
8.4
January 13, 2019
The HD X is a jack of all trades which I really love. If the traction and containment were a little better, these Hyperdunks would be close to perfect!
More details
7.0
September 26, 2018
The Hyperdunk X is an above average performer. The fit, materials, and support do very well. Unfortunately, the traction on mildly dusty courts is a bit disappointing.
More details
User Reviews of the Nike Hyperdunk X:
User Rating: 9.8 (ranks #2 of 381)
10 - Amazing
3
9 - Great
0
8 - Good
0
7 - Average
0
6 - Subpar
0
5 - Poor
0
9.8
November 17, 2023

Excellent shoe.
Great for any position.
Its the more responsive and light weight version the GT Jump and GT Jump 2.
More details
10.0
August 4, 2023
User didn't add a summary.
More details
Traction of the Nike Hyperdunk X:
Expert Traction Rating: 7.8 (ranks #329 of 381)
User Traction Rating: 9.3 (ranks #87 of 381)
10 - Amazing
1
9 - Great
3
8 - Good
2
7 - Average
0
6 - Subpar
1
5 - Poor
0
9.0
September 26, 2018
Works well on every kind of court - I am not sure I ever wiped the outsole while wearing the Hyperdunk X.
More details
8.0
September 26, 2018
The wavy traction pattern worked well on clean courts. On dusty courts, you lose a lot of bite and need to wipe from time to time.
More details
8.0
January 13, 2019
The traction took a little break-in time but did a good job overall.
More details
6.0
September 26, 2018
The traction didn't really give me the amount of grip that I personally like, especially on dusty courts.
More details
Cushion of the Nike Hyperdunk X:
Expert Cushion Rating: 8.5 (ranks #197 of 381)
User Cushion Rating: 10.0 (ranks #11 of 381)
10 - Amazing
4
9 - Great
2
8 - Good
0
7 - Average
1
6 - Subpar
0
5 - Poor
0
9.5
September 26, 2018
The cushioning is fantastic. No pain, no aches, no harsh jarring from landing, and it feels quick and bouncy on every move.
More details
8.5
September 26, 2018
The Air Zoom units in the heel and forefoot give you solid bounce and decent impact protection.
More details
9.0
January 13, 2019
The Zoom cushioning is a nice blend of comfort, impact protection, and springiness.
More details
7.0
September 26, 2018
The Zoom Air units in the heel and forefoot get the job done. But I can't help but feel like it's a step back from React cushioning in the Hyperdunk 2017 or the full-length Zoom of the Hyperdunk 2016.
More details
Materials of the Nike Hyperdunk X:
Expert Materials Rating: 7.6 (ranks #334 of 381)
User Materials Rating: 10.0 (ranks #5 of 381)
10 - Amazing
3
9 - Great
1
8 - Good
1
7 - Average
2
6 - Subpar
0
5 - Poor
0
7.0
September 26, 2018
The materials are…okay. Nothing is premium except for the little bit of leather on the heel cup, but it works.
More details
8.5
September 26, 2018
The materials feel pretty standard, definitely not premium. However, the shoe is well ventilated and the materials get the job done.
More details
8.0
January 13, 2019
Nothing fancy, but the textile upper is thick, comfortable, and requires zero break-in time.
More details
7.0
September 26, 2018
The upper materials are basic but get the job done.
More details
Support of the Nike Hyperdunk X:
Expert Support Rating: 8.3 (ranks #249 of 381)
User Support Rating: 10.0 (ranks #7 of 381)
10 - Amazing
3
9 - Great
2
8 - Good
1
7 - Average
1
6 - Subpar
0
5 - Poor
0
9.0
September 26, 2018
The lacing system pulls the shoe tightly and securely around your foot. The heel counter, midfoot shank, and the small outriggers also help with support.
More details
9.0
September 26, 2018
Huge heel counter prevents heel slippage, lateral outrigger provides a lot of stability and there is no side-to-side movement in the footbed.
More details
8.0
January 13, 2019
Flat outsole and outrigger, midfoot shank, and tight lacing system combine for a very supportive shoe.
More details
7.0
September 26, 2018
The support is not outstanding but still above average.
More details
Fit of the Nike Hyperdunk X:
Expert Fit Rating: 8.8 (ranks #55 of 381)
User Fit Rating: 9.7 (ranks #8 of 381)
10 - Amazing
2
9 - Great
4
8 - Good
1
7 - Average
0
6 - Subpar
0
5 - Poor
0
9.0
September 26, 2018
The fit is accommodating to different foot-shapes and needs.
More details
9.0
September 26, 2018
The fit is pretty nice even though it is hard to get your feet into these shoes.
More details
9.0
January 13, 2019
No side-to-side movement,heel slip, or deadspace in the toe box. Awesome job!
More details
8.0
September 26, 2018
The Hyperdunk X fits like a glove.
More details
Durability of the Nike Hyperdunk X:
User Durability Rating: 8.7 (ranks #125 of 381)
10 - Amazing
1
9 - Great
0
8 - Good
2
7 - Average
0
6 - Subpar
0
5 - Poor
0
Outdoor of the Nike Hyperdunk X:
Expert Outdoor Rating: 25.0 (ranks #247 of 381)
User Outdoor Rating: 50.0 (ranks #222 of 381)
Good (100%)
0
Fair (50%)
2
Bad (0%)
1
no
September 26, 2018
Don’t even think a couple of months on concrete/blacktop is possible because it ain’t.
More details
fair
September 26, 2018
The Hyperdunk X won't last forever outdoors, but it will work just fine as long it lasts.
More details
Width of the Nike Hyperdunk X:
very narrow
0
slightly narrow
1
regular
4
slightly wide
0
very wide
0
regularly wide
September 26, 2018
Regularly wide.
More details
slightly narrow
September 26, 2018
A little bit narrow in the forefoot.
More details
Size of the Nike Hyperdunk X:
very small
0
slightly small
0
true to size
6
slightly long
1
very long
0
½ size large
September 26, 2018
If you like a little room up front, go true to size. If you like as little space as possible, go down a half size and enjoy.
More details
true to size
September 26, 2018
If you have wide feet go up half a size, regular feet go true to size.
More details
true to size
January 13, 2019
True to size for almost everyone except the wide footers.
More details
true to size
September 26, 2018
I suggest going true to size.
More details
Share this article:
Sharing is caring:




















