The Air Jordan 1 is the most iconic basketball shoe of all time and started a signature line that is still going strong today - more than 35 years later! Today, Jordan Brand is generating over $3 billion in revenue per year, accounting for 8% of Nike's overall sales.
While a large part of this revenue comes from re-releasing older Air Jordan models like the coveted Air Jordan 11 "Concords", Jordan Brand is still releasing some of the best performance basketball shoes on the market.
In this article, we are going to focus on the currently available Jordans that perform the best on the hardwood.
Best Jordans Shoes to Play Basketball in:
- 8.6 rating based on 6 expert reviews
- The Air Jordan 38 Low provides all the performance of the 38 with a lower cut.
- All players can take advantage of the comfortable cushioning and reliable traction.
- 8.3 rating based on 7 expert reviews
- The Jordan 37 Low offers the same performance as the 37 for a lower price.
- A perfect selection for players who want bouncy cushioning in a low-top shoe.
- 8.3 rating based on 8 expert reviews
- The Air Jordan 37 is a top performer with bouncy forefoot cushioning and strong materials.
- Recommended for forefoot-heavy players looking for a bouncy setup
- 8.2 rating based on 6 expert reviews
- The Jordan Luka 3 is a bulky-looking shoe that plays more balanced than it looks thanks to its tacky traction.
- The Luka 3 is best for shifty, balanced players who mainly play on clean courts.
- 8.2 rating based on 8 expert reviews
- The Air Jordan 39 is a great performance shoe with many positive features and a few negative ones.
- This is the perfect shoe for players who love explosive cushioning setups.
- 8.1 rating based on 2 expert reviews
- The Jordan One Take 4 is a decently performing shoe with reliable traction.
- Players who mainly play outdoors and prefer responsive cushioning will enjoy this shoe.
- 8.0 rating based on 8 expert reviews
- The Jordan Zion 3 is a switch-up in the Zion line. It has solid traction and impressive reinforced materials.
- The Zion 3 is best for heavier players with fast-paced play styles.
- 7.9 rating based on 10 expert reviews
- The Jordan Tatum 1 is a unique initial signature for Jayson Tatum, where the cushioning excels.
- A good pickup for bouncy players looking for a lightweight shoe.
- 7.9 rating based on 5 expert reviews
- Russell Westbrook's latest shoe with Jordan Brand, the Why Not Zer0.6, is a sturdy performing shoe, especially on clean courts.
- A great pickup for players with straight-line speed and explosiveness.
- 7.7 rating based on 8 expert reviews
- The Jordan Tatum 3 makes minor improvements to the cushioning and is the best shoe in the lineup so far.
- The Tatum 3 is best for players who move a lot on their forefoot.
- 7.7 rating based on 9 expert reviews
- The Jordan Tatum 2 is a decent performance shoe, mainly held back by the traction.
- The Tatum 2 is best for players who prefer balanced setups with Air Strobel.
- 7.5 rating based on 4 expert reviews
- The Jordan Zion 3 SE upgrades the materials and lockdown, but the fit and traction are problematic.
- The Jordan Zion 3 SE is best for narrow-foot players who like a drop-in midsole setup.
- 7.4 rating based on 5 expert reviews
- The Jordan One Take 5 has excellent torsional support and stability, but the shoe is stiff.
- The Jordan One Take 5 is best for players who play around the hoop.
Best Jordans for Basketball
1. Air Jordan 38 Low
Performance Rating:
8.6
The Air Jordan 38 Low provides all the performance of the 38 with a lower cut.Overall rating based on 6 reviews
Pros:
Improved containment and stability
Traction and cushioning remain unchanged
Cons:
Dust pickup
What do the experts think?
Jordan Brand did a solid job on their latest release, the Air Jordan 38 Low.
The traction performance remains the same on the Low. It performs exceptionally well as long as players wipe the dust.
The full-length Zoom Strobel remains a favourite amongst reviewers. This shoe has one of the best cushioning setups on the market.
Reviewers also enjoyed the containment and stability of the 38 Low, especially around the heel area.
There are no complaints about the material usage. Reviewers say the shoe feels comfortable on foot.
The Air Jordan 38 Low delivers impressive performance in a low-cut form factor. The traction and cushioning combo remains elite.
2. Air Jordan 37 Low
Performance Rating:
8.3
The Jordan 37 Low offers the same performance as the 37 for a lower price.Overall rating based on 7 reviews
Pros:
Bouncy cushioning setup
Grippy traction on clean courts
Cons:
Traction picks up dust easily
Slightly narrow fit
What do the experts think?
The traction is grippy, especially on clear courts, but it can pick up dust quickly. Make sure to wipe.
It seems to be a consensus among reviewers that the cushioning is explosive and bouncy.
The materials don't feel premium but are still breathable and keep you contained within the shoe.
Support and lockdown aren't an issue either. No reviewers reported any containment issues.
Some reviewers describe the Jordan 37 Low as similar to a low-top Kyrie model. The traction is strong, and the cushion is bouncy, especially under the forefoot.
3. Air Jordan 37
Performance Rating:
8.3
The Air Jordan 37 is a top performer with bouncy forefoot cushioning and strong materials.Overall rating based on 8 reviews
Pros:
Bouncy forefoot cushioning
Materials are strong for performance
Cons:
Materials are not premium
Heel cushioning could be better
What do the experts think?
Jordan Brand switches up the traction to look more like the traction on the Zion 1, but the performance is still there.
The double-stacked Zoom Strobel and Zoom Air unit in the forefoot provide plenty of bounce and responsiveness. Meanwhile, the heel cushioning is Formula 23, and it feels caged.
All reviewers agree that the materials are not premium but excel in all performance aspects.
The fit is improved compared to last year's Air Jordan 36. It accommodates slightly wide feet better.
The support features are all there too. The materials work well to keep the foot contained during play.
The latest mainline Jordan, the Air Jordan 37, offers innovative performance and has plenty of features to love.
4. Jordan Luka 3
Performance Rating:
8.2
The Jordan Luka 3 is a bulky-looking shoe that plays more balanced than it looks thanks to its tacky traction.Overall rating based on 6 reviews
Pros:
Effective traction on clean courts
Comfortable materials
Cons:
Picks up dust quickly
Retains heat with a lack of breathability
What do the experts think?
Luka Doncic's third signature shoe is a step in the right direction in on-court performance.
The traction pattern performs very well, especially on clean courts. However, most reviewers experienced the outsole picking up dust quickly, which hampers performance.
Cushlon 3.0 is the foam of choice in the midsole. It feels balanced, responsive, and low to the ground.
The materials are soft and comfortable. They provide support and containment, but reviewers mention the upper isn't breathable.
Support and lockdown are not an issue. The upper construction and the iso plate provide plenty of containment. The shoe's base also helps with stability.
The Jordan Luka 3 improves on the previous two Luka signatures with reliable traction and balanced cushioning. Just make sure to wipe the dust off the outsole.
5. Air Jordan 39
Performance Rating:
8.2
The Air Jordan 39 is a great performance shoe with many positive features and a few negative ones.Overall rating based on 8 reviews
Pros:
One of the best cushioning setups
Fit is close to perfect
Cons:
Lack of outrigger hurts stability
The outsole is a dust magnet
What do the experts think?
The Air Jordan 39 is a polarizing shoe with high highs and low lows when it comes to its performance features.
Reviewers agree the traction performance is excellent on clean courts, and the outsole is a dust magnet. The dust pickup affected some reviewers more negatively than others.
The full-length ZoomX and Zoom Air setup is excellent for comfort and bounce, but it can be excessive and unstable because of the cup sole.
Materials are comfortable and feel supportive. The upper conforms around the feet nicely, but there's no breathability.
The fit is close to perfect. It's slightly snug and accommodating around the forefoot.
Support is an issue. There's no outrigger, and the outsole does not contain the shoe's soft foam. Reviewers complained about a lack of lateral stability.
The Air Jordan 39 has impressive tech features, but the poor execution keeps the shoe from being a unanimous great performer.
6. Jordan One Take 4
Performance Rating:
8.1
The Jordan One Take 4 is a decently performing shoe with reliable traction.Overall rating based on 2 reviews
Pros:
Durable performing traction
Reactive cushioning
Cons:
Not much impact protection
Cheap materials
What do the experts think?
For performance, reviewers ranked the traction of the One Take 4 as the best feature. The herringbone pattern is grippy and stable.
The cushioning is not plush, and there isn't much impact protection, but it is responsive.
The materials on the shoe feel cheap and flimsy. Although, performance isn't affected too negatively.
There were no complaints about support and lockdown. The stability held up well too.
Overall, the Jordan One Take 4 is a decent performance shoe. The traction stands out, and it's budget-friendly.
7. Jordan Zion 3
Performance Rating:
8.0
The Jordan Zion 3 is a switch-up in the Zion line. It has solid traction and impressive reinforced materials.Overall rating based on 8 reviews
Pros:
Reinforced materials
The midfoot flange provides extra stability
Cons:
Dust pickup on the traction
Feels stiff initially
What do the experts think?
Zion Williamson is on his third signature shoe with Jordan Brand, and this iteration takes a different approach to the support.
The traction performs well, especially indoors, but some reviewers mention that dust pickup is a flaw.
Jordan Brand uses a Formula 23 drop-in midsole. It feels soft and comfortable, but the tech specs could be better in a more traditional setup.
The upper gets reinforced with extra rubber and a TPU layer, providing additional support.
The midfoot and medial side flanges increase the shoe's stability. The padding around the heel also increases lockdown.
Reviewers agree that the fit is narrow and not meant for players with wide feet.
Overall, the Jordan Zion 3 plays well for stockier players who can take advantage of the stability features at a higher pace.
8. Jordan Tatum 1
Performance Rating:
7.9
The Jordan Tatum 1 is a unique initial signature for Jayson Tatum, where the cushioning excels.Overall rating based on 10 reviews
Pros:
Comfortable materials
Bouncy and responsive cushioning
Cons:
Dust affects the traction
Bizarre support setup
What do the experts think?
Jayson Tatum's first signature shoe introduces a unique traction setup that reviewers called inconsistent. It performs on clean courts, but dust causes issues.
The cushioning was universally praised, by reviewers, for being bouncy underneath the forefoot and comfortable under the heel.
The materials are light, breathable, and comfortable.
There are no performance issues with the shoe's support, but reviewers said the setup is bizarre and feels weird under the arch.
Overall, the Jordan Tatum 1 is still a solid first shoe in Tatum's line. It's the lightest Jordan shoe, and the Zoom Air delivers.
9. Jordan Why Not Zero.6
Performance Rating:
7.9
Russell Westbrook's latest shoe with Jordan Brand, the Why Not Zer0.6, is a sturdy performing shoe, especially on clean courts.Overall rating based on 5 reviews
Pros:
Traction performs on clean courts
Sturdy materials
Cons:
Traction needs break-in time
Fits long
What do the experts think?
The Jordan Why Not Zer0.6 provides solid traction on clean courts, but dust can be an issue. The performance requires a break-in period, though.
Its cushioning is comfortable, and the forefoot Zoom unit is noticeable.
The materials create a supportive environment and help fortify the shoe. You feel sturdy and locked in.
The shoe is stable, and there are no lateral containment issues. However, some reviewers feel the extra space in the forefoot made them less secure.
Russell Westbrook's latest shoe is a solid choice for players who thrive on fluid up-and-down movement along the court.
10. Jordan Tatum 3
Performance Rating:
7.7
The Jordan Tatum 3 makes minor improvements to the cushioning and is the best shoe in the lineup so far.Overall rating based on 8 reviews
Pros:
Cushlon 3.0 feels soft and comfortable
Lightweight and flexible upper materials
Cons:
Outsole is a dust magnet
Lacks a lateral outrigger
What do the experts think?
Jayson Tatum's third signature shoe is his best yet, but not by much.
The traction performance is inconsistent. Sometimes, the grip performs well, but other times, reviewers mention slipping.
Jordan Brand uses Cushlon 3.0 as the midsole foam. It feels soft and comfortable.
The materials are flexible, lightweight and breathable. The upper conforms to your feet well, but the materials loosen with time.
Support and lockdown are not the best. The upper lacks containment, and heel stability could be improved. There's also no outrigger.
The Jordan Tatum 3 improves, but not enough to be a good performer. The traction is too inconsistent.
11. Jordan Tatum 2
Performance Rating:
7.7
The Jordan Tatum 2 is a decent performance shoe, mainly held back by the traction.Overall rating based on 9 reviews
Pros:
Lateral containment is excellent
Air Strobel is comfortable
Cons:
Outsole is a dust magnet
Materials run hot
What do the experts think?
The Jordan Tatum 2 would be a better shoe if it weren't for the traction. The outsole collects dust quickly, which hinders performance.
The full-length Air Strobel is a step up in cushioning. It feels balanced but not bouncy.
Jordan Brand uses lower-quality materials, but the durability is solid. The shoe is lightweight and comfortable. Heat retention could be better.
The upper construction provides extra stability. The lateral containment is excellent, too.
Overall, the Jordan Tatum 2 improves on the construction and stability of the previous model, but the unreliable traction on dust is too much of a drawback.
12. Jordan Zion 3 SE
Performance Rating:
7.5
The Jordan Zion 3 SE upgrades the materials and lockdown, but the fit and traction are problematic.Overall rating based on 4 reviews
Pros:
Upgraded drop-in midsole
Materials feel better
Cons:
Runs extremely narrow
Dust heavily affects the traction
What do the experts think?
The Jordan Zion 3 SE is Jordan Brand's attempt to upgrade the standard Zion 3 that doesn't hit the mark.
The traction performs well on clean courts only. The outsole picks up tons of dust, causing players to slide on dirtier courts.
The updated drop-in midsole features full-length Zoom but loses the shank. The performance is better for shock absorption but worse for bounciness.
The materials feel more premium without losing much breathability.
Jordan Brand added a midfoot strap on the SE version. Coupled with the heel counter, it keeps your foot contained nicely. However, the narrow fit negates the added benefits of the improved support and lockdown.
The cons of the updated Jordan Zion 3 SE outweigh the pros. The performance is held back by the traction and fit.
13. Jordan One Take 5
Performance Rating:
7.4
The Jordan One Take 5 has excellent torsional support and stability, but the shoe is stiff.Overall rating based on 5 reviews
Pros:
Comfortable padding
Decent traction
Cons:
A stiff shank plate limits mobility
Cushioning feels basic
What do the experts think?
The Jordan One Take 5 feels more like a skateboarding shoe.
The traction is decent, particularly on clean courts. Dust accumulates quickly, though.
There's a forefoot Zoom unit, but the Phylon makes the cushioning feel stiff. However, the responsiveness is decent.
The materials are decent. There's plenty of structure and reinforcement.
All reviewers mention the shoe is stiff due to the midfoot shank plant. The torsional support and stability are impressive if that's what you're looking for, though.
Impressive stability and torsional support make the Jordan One Take 5 an average performer.
